Subscribe to Original Pechanga

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Larry Echohawk Complies with Judges Order to Reinstate San Pascual Disenrolled, But Places Their Per Capita in Escrow

Larry Echohawk apparently is able to screw those San Pascual members, under guise of following the IGRA (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) saying in his 3 page order that paying per capita, while their fate is still uncertain is a violation of the IGRA.

Larry Echohawks Order can be read here

They are all still tribal members except they won't get paid. Nice Larry.

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Haha larry chickenhawk do what she says Boy!

Anonymous said...

Judge Gonzalez stopped the disenrollment process pending the outcome of the lawsuit, which means the Altos' are enrolled members of the tribe until the case is decided, according to the order. As such, Judge Gonzalez said the bureau must uphold its obligations to them as tribal members, including its responsibility "to protect the individual members' interests until this dispute is fully adjudicated."


Its about time a Judge makes the BIA do their job.

IRMA Gonzalez San Diego court is already known to be (Indian gladiator court).......


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92v3O0t0EfU

Heres some pechanga Indians protesting in front of Judge Gonzalez's court.

Anonymous said...

IRMA Gonzalez San Diego court is already known to be (Indian gladiator court).......

all eyes are on this court.....check out my boyfriends youtube video.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92v3O0t0EfU

Anonymous said...

Larry Chickenhawk, fitting name!

Anonymous said...

Here we go again!! toot toot

Anonymous said...

Mr. Echohawk, shows his hatred for being called out on his wrongdoing.

If they are still tribal members, they should receive their per capita until it's determined they are not.

Will he also call for the return of federal monies received based on the population of the Alto's?

Anonymous said...

I think its a JOKE that a FEDERAL Judge has to TRUMP chickenhawk,it does not say much for the system.

The fact that Judge gonzalez quote's IGRA (Indian gaming regulatory act)is huge!

This has never been done,I don't know of any case where any Judge has done this?

(IGRA) has been known to be worthless!

Anonymous said...

I think Echohawk only enforces the rules he wants to.

Why not stand up to tribes that violate the rights of their people?

Use your authority to SPEAK OUT against what is happening in Indian Gaming Country.

Anonymous said...

Furhtermore SINCE JUDGE GONZALEZ wants to enforce IGRA ,Pechanga's moratorium violate's IGRA!

OH SHIT did I say that!

Anonymous said...

Furthermore sorry

smokeybear said...

What part of following the rules doesn't "Chicken-Hawk" (I like that) "Understand?" They are still part of their "Tribe," so why "Sanction" them by holding their "Per Cap?" Every move this "Clown" makes is to "Discredit" the true "Native American Indians" in his charge. His "Bias" towards the "Casino Indian" is totally "Inexcuseable," and without merit. This brings into "Question" his "Motives," for he routinely backs every "Criminal Act" that these "Corrupt Tribal Leaders" put forth. They won their court case and should be members in good standing as any other member of their "Tribe." But "No," Chicken Hawk has to pull a fast one and hold up their "Percap." Now if that isn't siding with the "Casino Indian, then what "Is?" Nice going "Chicken Hawk!" There is no way that you can "Justify" this increditably "Lame Act." They won their court case, backoff and let it be. Why do you have to mess with something good in "Indian Country?" You should be happy that "Justice" was served and this "Illegal Disenrollment" was overturned, at least for now. So where do your "Loyalties Lie?" I'm afraid its not with the "Oppessed Native American," and that is "Sad!" Your job is to "Protect Us All," not just the "Casino Indian" and you fail "Miserably." Are you in "Bed" with these "Criminal Tribal Leaders?" Sure looks Like it.

Anonymous said...

OMG SOMEONE might argue in court since JUDGE gonzalez ,quoted IGRA and set up escrow accounts for these San Pasqual indians (and investigated this )SHE COULD DO THIS FOR PECHANGA.

IGRA TRUMPS tribal laws they wave that when they open casino....

Anonymous said...

OMG (public interest) in Judge Gonzalez's ruling WAY TO GO TRIBES THAT DISENROLL (YOU DESTROYED sovereignty)! PAT YOURSELF on the BACK! SEE BELOW



public interest in having the Secretary’s determination and procedures
reviewed on the merits outweighs any possible interference with the Tribe’s sovereignty.

Anonymous said...

HOLY SHIT JUDGE GONZALEZ (BODY SLAMS TRIBE )take money put in escrow account for each member.

Wow a court can do this NOW without a tribe being PRESENT! hahahahaahaa jajajaaja! PAT yourself on the back!

WE DON'T WANT THE U.S to SUFFER read the below statement.



Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, because complete relief can be accorded in the Tribe’s absence,
because the Tribe’s interest may be adequately represented by the federal government, and
because the federal government is unlikely to suffer inconsistent obligations, the Court concludes
that the Tribe is not a required party under either Rule 19(a)(i) or Rule 19(a)(ii).
In light of the above determination, the Court need not consider whether the Tribe’s joinder
is feasible and, if not, whether the action can proceed in the Tribe’s absence. See Northrop Corp.
v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 705 F.2d 1030, 1043 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, at least at this
stage, the Court need not determine whether the Tribe has waived its sovereign immunity from suit
by either providing in its Constitution for the Secretary’s review of the enrollment challenges or by
actively participating in the administrative proceedings giving rise to this suit.

Anonymous said...

HOLY SHIT JUDGE GONZALEZ (BODY SLAMS TRIBE )take money put in escrow account for each member.

Wow a court can do this NOW without a tribe being PRESENT! hahahahaahaa jajajaaja! PAT yourself on the back!

WE DON'T WANT THE U.S to SUFFER read the below statement.



Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, because complete relief can be accorded in the Tribe’s absence,
because the Tribe’s interest may be adequately represented by the federal government, and
because the federal government is unlikely to suffer inconsistent obligations, the Court concludes
that the Tribe is not a required party under either Rule 19(a)(i) or Rule 19(a)(ii).
In light of the above determination, the Court need not consider whether the Tribe’s joinder
is feasible and, if not, whether the action can proceed in the Tribe’s absence. See Northrop Corp.
v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 705 F.2d 1030, 1043 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, at least at this
stage, the Court need not determine whether the Tribe has waived its sovereign immunity from suit
by either providing in its Constitution for the Secretary’s review of the enrollment challenges or by
actively participating in the administrative proceedings giving rise to this suit.

Anonymous said...

Echohawk has a lot of explaining to do...In a letter he wrote to the tribe he said that the Altos are considered tribal members during such time and shall receive all benefits of being tribal members, including per capita payments. Any withholding of funds by an individual could be subject to civil and criminal court... fast forward a year and a half and he says the complete opposite despite a judges order... When is it Echohawks job on how the tribe handles its per cap distribution...Thats what the TRAP is for...It must be the tribes law firms strong ties to the BIA putting their two scents in... Lobbying at work...

Anonymous said...

You're so right, it's lawson's attorneys doing all the implementing,because lawson does not lift a finger to put in hand to write anything down, and by the way he does'nt have the penmaship or is knowlegeable of what to put down on paper, this is why whenever asked he always never has a comment.

smokeybear said...

It is a known fact that a "Chicken hawk" is a "Devious Preditor" that will attack and feed on anything that can't or won't fight back. In essence, "Echohawk...A.K.A. Chickenhawk." You spesk with "Forked Tongue." You say one thing, then you do another. If that isn't being "Two Faced," then what is? You choose to back these "Corrupt and Criminal Tribal Leaders" without question... "Why Is This?" Is it because there is "NO Money In Helping Oppressed Native Americans?" Or could it be be that "You Are Paid Not Too?" You "Refuse To Act" on behalf of the ones that need help the most, while backing the "Casino Indians" and their "Corrupt and Criminal Acts." It's not that you can't help,.....Its that you...."WON'T!"..."Can't anger the..."Big Bad Wolves,"... A.K.A... the "Corrupt And Criminal Tribal Leaders," because it's got to be all about the "Money," and whose in "Bed With Who!" The "B.I.A." and "Chickenhawk's" actions, or intentions, for the good of "Indian Country" has always been "Suspect," and nothing has changed. "Shame On You!"

Anonymous said...

Darrell Issa has to be included in this too.

He's avoiding calling for a hearing on the Indian Civil Rights act.

Shameful

Anonymous said...

if they have been put back as full tribal member status then Larry EchoHawk is violating the IGRA. If EchoHawk botherd to read IGRA there is no where that it say that if members ship is pending there money will be cut off. The sec of IGRA that EchoHawk refrance to 7201 is the out line of what the act is for he needs to refrance the right sec. Sec 7210 is the sec for per capita. I have read it and I dont see the violation.

Anonymous said...

290.1 etc talks about the revenue or per capita under (IGRA).

What are you talking about?

(refrance) is that like in france?