Saturday, May 30, 2015

The THIEF OF PECHANGA, Jennie Miranda...... She's BAAAACK

Yes, folks, the elderly Jennie Miranda , the woman who was disenfranchised for stealing from the tribe, banished for 30 years, has been holding court at the mailboxes...  Is she planning a return?

The CPP accused  Jennie Miranda (former spokeperson for Pechanga and mother of thief Larry Miranda, also banished) of "being unfair to people" and telling "lies" and wanting to bulldoze sensitive sites and burial grounds.   She's not supposed to be on the rez, yet has been seen at the park.

Why does the tribe allow this criminal element to remain?

Word is that there will be a QUID PRO QUO attempt, to allow Jennie back into  the tribe if Macarro's little brother John is protected.

Allowing a thief back in to protect ANOTHER THIEF?

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's ok to disenroll allotted members with ties to the creation of Pechanga, and steal their share of everything, even mailboxes. However if your caught stealing from the band we can look the other way, because you allowed us to take the Allottees rights away. Macarro et al

Anonymous said...

Holding court at the mail boxes ? Hahahaha ,....they will not stop until that casino is shut down.

Anonymous said...

mark is going to the DOJ.

Anonymous said...

Only to make a donation....DOJ didn't DO anything to Jennie...

Anonymous said...

Jennie is trying to make a trade off with Mark Macarro. Let his brother stay in the tribe for stealing thousand$/million$ by bringing Jennie back for stealing MILLION$!!! Sounds fair to me?

Anonymous said...

If your looking for John Macarro these days? He's hiding out at his Hawaii house (that he built on money stolen from Pechanga). Heard the Pechnga Church in now looking for a new alter boy to replace John Macarro. Maybe his brother Mark will fill is spot? That is till he's caught with his hand in the cookie jar! We all know it's been in there!

Anonymous said...

Mark said "We have a right to determine membership." Correct, the truth is WE ALREADY DETERMINED MEMBERSHIP, and our Ancestors were honored and respected. Now to have a faction led by Macarro et al thinking it's legal and ok to dishonor our Ancestors, determine membership on enrolled members who meet the requirements, take away all their rights and spend their share of everything the band has been allowed to participate in. Pechanga deserves to be honored with truth. Hunter family is Pechanga, no other family is more Pechanga than Paulina and her descendants. Your Ancestors knew the truth and filed oral depositions on Allotted Indians. The reservation and Casino would not be here today if the Ancestors did not record the truth. Honor them NOW!

Anonymous said...

The B.I.A. and congress said the tribe has a right to determine tribal membership based on tribal law and tribal constitution. This means the tribes can deny membership and disenroll following the criteria of tribal by laws and their constitution. Now this is were tribes like Pechanga , Pala , San Pasqaul and others have broken tribal by laws and constitution just because they are in office disenrolling who they dislike or threatens their political power. Not enrolling others but enrolling their family for votes. So if congress , senate and the B.I.A. make strong statements of tribes rights to disenroll based on tribal laws and constitution then they need to make shore that the disenrolling tribes are following their tribal laws.

Joe Arsanis said...

I AM POSTING THIS COMMENT AS AN OUTSIDER IN HOPES OF RETURNING PEACE AND HARMONY BACK TO THE PEOPLE OF
PECHANGA. I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH ALL ISSUES, HOWEVER MOST PEOPLE CONSTANTLY READ ABOUT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, DISENROLLMENT AND DISENFRANCHISED MEMBERS. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE FORMER SPOKESPERSON JENNIE MIRANDA RETURNED TO MEMBERSHIP WITH FULL PRIVILEDGES, AFTERALL SHE PLAYED A LARGE PART IN BRING GAMING TO PECHANGA. I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO SEE A RETURN OF FORMER MEMBERS WHO WERE ILLEGALLY DISENROLLED. A VOTE BY THE CURRENT MEMBERS AND BARRED MEMBERS. VOTING WOULD CONSIST OF ONE ISSUE, BRING BACK THE ABOVE OR NO ONE. NO SPLIT DECISIONS, ALL OR NONE. VOTES CAN BE PUBLICLY POSTED OR NOT. PER CAPITA MAY BE REDUCED BUT ALL RECEIVING SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN THE CONTINUED IN-HOUSE FIGHTING THAT MAY WELL REDUCE REVENUE FOR ALL.
I WILL STOP HERE, AT LEAST THIS MAY CREATE CONVERSATION ON THE REZ. BURY THE HATCHET AND MOVE ON.
A FORMER EMPLOYEE, JOSEPH ARSANIS